Since January 1, 2024, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) has been extended to cover CO₂ emissions from all commercial vessels of at least 5,000 GT when they call at EU ports, regardless of flag or ownership. In a phased approach designed to ease the transition, ship operators must surrender allowances for 40 percent of their verified 2024 emissions by September 30, 2025; 70 percent of 2025 emissions by 2026; and 100 percent of reported emissions from 2027 onward. For medium-sized freight forwarders, who typically bundle sea, road, rail, and air transport under single contracts, this regulatory shift represents both a compliance challenge and an opportunity to differentiate on sustainability.

‍

The cost implications of carbon pricing for maritime emissions are already material. Trading Economics reports that EU Carbon Permits (EUAs) reached €75.94 per tCO₂ on June 13, 2025, up nearly 5 percent over the previous month. Carriers are responding by embedding “carbon surcharges” into ocean-freight rates, which analysts estimate add 5–10 percent to baseline tariffs, depending on vessel fuel efficiency, trade lane distance, and carrier routing practices. On intra-EU routes, where voyages are shorter and port-call frequency is higher, surcharges may translate to €50–€200 extra per TEU. Moreover, some carriers are exploring legal workarounds, such as discharging containers at non-EU transshipment hubs so that only the leg into the EU bears an ETS cost, potentially lengthening transit times while marginally reducing carbon fees passed on to shippers.

‍

To manage this volatility, medium-sized forwarders should deploy a multi-pronged surcharge strategy. First, adopt transparent pass-through pricing: invoice clients a discrete “carbon levy” tied to quarterly average EUA prices, enabling shippers to align their own Scope 3 reporting with forwarder data. Second, consider margin absorption on highly competitive corridors to protect volume, while accepting incremental margin compression. Third, utilize financial hedging instruments such as EUA futures or over-the-counter forwards to lock in allowance prices six to twelve months in advance, stabilizing rate cards despite market swings. Finally, negotiate long-term, carbon-inclusive contracts with carriers: secure fixed carbon-included ocean rates in exchange for minimum annual volume commitments, thereby transferring price risk upstream and offering clients rate certainty through 2026 and beyond.

‍

Navigating carbon accounting internally is equally critical. Forwarders must accurately measure and report Scope 3 emissions, those generated by third-party carriers, to satisfy shippers’ growing sustainability mandates. Several GLEC-aligned (Global Logistics Emissions Council) tools facilitate detailed, mode-agnostic calculations:

• Pledge Freight Emissions Calculator: Offers the “Clarity™” feature, which transparently documents assumptions and methodology for each shipment leg, ensuring traceability throughout the supply chain.
• EcoTransIT World: Developed by Fraunhofer IML, INFRAS, and ifeu, this platform is certified under ISO 14083 and compliant with the GHG Protocol. It provides bottom-up energy and emissions modeling across truck, vessel, rail, and air segments, including transshipments and warehousing.
• Chain.io Environmental SCM: Embeds automated CO₂e reporting within any TMS via API or EDI, streamlining real-time client dashboards and compliance with upcoming SEC and EU disclosure rules.
• project44 Emissions Monitoring: Delivers shipment-level, GLEC-accredited emissions data across all core modes, enabling dynamic route optimization and carrier selection to reduce carbon intensity.
• Flexport Emissions Calculator: Integrates the EcoTransit methodology into a user-friendly interface, ideal for rapid quote-level footprinting and scenario planning for alternative carriers or routes.

Implementing an emissions-accounting program requires disciplined execution. Begin by automating data feeds (carrier manifests, port-call logs) into one or more calculators to minimize manual entry errors. Conduct a pilot phase, comparing results across two tools to reconcile factor libraries and identify variances. Next, benchmark your key trade lanes (e.g., Shanghai–Rotterdam, Los Angeles–New York) for per-TEU or per-kg CO₂e intensity, then leverage these benchmarks in client discussions (“Switching from Carrier X to Y saves 3 kg CO₂e per TEU”). Empower sales teams with templated sustainability reports that illustrate carbon impacts of service-level adjustments. Finally, pursue third-party certification of emissions data, via a recognized audit firm, to enhance credibility in ESG-driven RFPs.

‍

While compliance drives immediate action, proactive carbon management can become a powerful value proposition. By packaging “green-freight” solutions, blending lower-carbon carriers with high-integrity offset portfolios, forwarders can attract shippers under increasing pressure to reduce value-chain emissions. Industry surveys indicate that ESG-focused clients are often willing to accept a 2–5 percent rate premium for verifiable emissions reductions and transparent carbon-levy reporting, and that such surcharges improve long-term client retention by reinforcing trust in the partnership.

‍

In summary, the EU ETS extension to maritime transport compels mid-sized freight forwarders to master both carbon-cost management and rigorous emissions accounting. Those who calibrate surcharge strategies, implement GLEC-aligned measurement tools, and articulate data-driven decarbonization roadmaps will not only ensure regulatory compliance but also secure competitive advantage among sustainability-driven shippers.

‍

Discover other freight solutions with Expedock's offshoring services. Schedule a FREE consultation today.